网络社会

小桥西边 2015-01-10 0

为了写论文而看，有些专有的名词翻译有点问题，但文章还是不错，了解网络与社会的关系必须看的

Yjq 2015-05-27 0

很老的书了，翻译的也不好，看到第五篇文章实在读不下去了。不建议阅读。

老圆老圆 2016-02-28 0

最大感受：“技术远非技术本身”，不可小觑，但它对社会的影响也远非现在盛行的决定论所宣扬的那样。人类社会任何惊喜或惊讶背后都有漫长的演变史，缓慢又细腻。PS.函数本学期课程浩如烟海的书单下，唯一且勉强完成的一本。

Rey Rey 2015-09-10 0

旧了

seny 2013-06-09 0

虚拟网络与现实社会，两者相互纠缠，渗透、影响、剥离……

吉吉 2012-04-18 0

主要是讲网络技术下的社会结构变迁，有意思的是提出社会的网络结构

Pranj 2012-06-21 0

用google翻译的

白菜君 2013-04-19 0

老卡老卡。。你的书名被翻译的。。。哎。。。

荧光棒 2016-12-08 0

各取所需

jun. 2014-08-12 2

整体来说，选文质量一般。并且，因撰写年代较久远（距今至少10年），数据、观点均偏老旧（保守）。雪上加霜的是，翻译相当糟糕，很多专用名词完全胡扯！（一切涉及非英语处、如西班牙语，错得离谱！）例：人名Aihua Ong在同一篇文章内竟能出现“艾瓦·昂”(P.374)和“爱德华·鸿哥”(P.395)两个译名，真是粗制滥造！

豆花娘 2016-08-31 1

值得一读再读

小桥西边 2015-01-10 0

为了写论文而看，有些专有的名词翻译有点问题，但文章还是不错，了解网络与社会的关系必须看的

Yjq 2015-05-27 0

很老的书了，翻译的也不好，看到第五篇文章实在读不下去了。不建议阅读。

老圆老圆 2016-02-28 0

最大感受：“技术远非技术本身”，不可小觑，但它对社会的影响也远非现在盛行的决定论所宣扬的那样。人类社会任何惊喜或惊讶背后都有漫长的演变史，缓慢又细腻。PS.函数本学期课程浩如烟海的书单下，唯一且勉强完成的一本。

Rey Rey 2015-09-10 0

旧了

seny 2013-06-09 0

虚拟网络与现实社会，两者相互纠缠，渗透、影响、剥离……

吉吉 2012-04-18 0

主要是讲网络技术下的社会结构变迁，有意思的是提出社会的网络结构

Pranj 2012-06-21 0

用google翻译的

书非常不错，对有社会学有兴趣的人建议看看

luwg001 2011-11-15 0赞

书写的早了点，2003年，但质量是不错的。
其中关于中国的网络的描述，可谓真有见地，邱林川先生也许早已料到‘长城放火墙’这一网络新创举。
书中谈到的硅谷和芬兰，谈到nokia，谈到小企业和大公司，这也许能为我们的技术创新提供启发。

network society

黠之大者 2010-12-17 0赞

Network society is defined by Manuel Castells (Castells and Ebooks 2004) as “a society whose social structure is made of networks powered by the microelectronics-based information and communication technologies.” (Manuel Castells’s imagination knows no boundary, and it’s still inconceivable to combine the computer and the genetic engineering. This is much more like the science fiction style, because he can’t give convincing arguments and the readers can’t falsify his assertion for the limit of time.) In Manuel Castells’ idea, the network society is relevant to informationalism. Informationalism is a technological paradigm based on the augmentation of the human capacity of information processing and communication made possible by the revolutions in microelectronics, software, and genetic engineering. So what’s more important is the development of technology.
As a good construct, network society should be different from the other pre-existing constructs or concepts. There are some similar constructs, and one of them is “social network”. The differences are apparent, and the social network is much more general concept of the network relationships, network society is a phase of the development of society. So the network society can be analyzed by adopting social network analysis method (SNA). According to Manuel Castells, motivated by the microelectronics-based information and communication technologies, there are three characteristics of the network society: flexibility, scalability, and survivability.
The characteristic of flexibility is related to the network structure of the social network of network society, and he asserts that the structure of the network society is dynamic. While, this is not convincing enough, his judgment is just verbal. Manuel Castells does not analyze the structure of the structure of network society in detail. However, we can understand this characteristic by adopting social network analysis framework: Every social network has its cluster coefficient, it measure the degree of density of the social network, when the cluster coefficient is big enough, the social network is called small world network (Watts and Strogatz 1998b), which is usually known as “six degrees of separation” (Watts and Strogatz 1998a).
Another characteristic of the network society “scalability” is relevant to another pattern of the social network—“scale-free”. The scale logarithmically with the system size (Barabasi and Albert 1999). The scale-free property of the complex social network portraits the characteristics of the degree of irregularity, there are some nodes having a lot of links, but most of the nodes having only a few links. If the attacker chooses to attack one of the nodes randomly, the network can survive, but if the attacker attacks the central nodes of the network, the social network will also collapse, this is exactly the situation of the network worm and hacker on the Internet. This is also a supplement to the third character of the network society: survivability.
The rise of network society reconstructs the former social relationships of the industrial society. There are three influencing factors account for the rise of network society in the 1970: the development of industrialism, production, capitalism and statism; the cultural social movements of the late 1960s and the early 1970s; the revolution and communication technologies. The network society is relevant to the globalization, now the social network in the world can be viewed as global network society. And the advent of the global network society is constructed by many communication forms, new media and communication forms emerging from the Internet: IM, SNS, online video site, blog.
What’s more important is that the network society will change the social relationship accordingly. A global social capital transformation is carrying out now, the former forms of social capital are changed and new forms of social capital are being created by the new communication forms in network society. Especially the online social capital is becoming one of the important parts of individual’s social relationship and resources. The relationships above can be summarized as figure 1.

Figure 1 technology, media use, network society and social change

Quotation
“There is a theoretical convergence between the two technological fields (Barabasi and Albert 1999; Jeong, Neda, and Barabasi 2003) around the analytical paradigm based on networking, complexity, self organization, and emergent properties, as illustrated some time ago by the work of visionary teams of researchers at the Santa Fe Institute and as theorized by Fritjof Capra.” (Castells and Ebooks 2004)
The reason I want to highlight the words above is that, as an emergence, network society is composed of complex network distinguished by its small-world property and scale-free property, the reason for its emergence is relevant to the self organization process, we all know Barabasi’s famous paper on how complex network emerges from the isolated nodes by adopting the local rule of preferential attachment. (Barabasi and Albert 1999; Jeong, Neda, and Barabasi 2003), in addition to that, Santa Fe Institute is one of the important centers of science of complexity, it’s a pleasant to find that Castells knows something about that.

Barabasi, A. L., and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439):509.
Castells, M., and Corporation Ebooks. 2004. The network society: A cross-cultural perspective: Edward Elgar.
Jeong, H., Z. Neda, and A. L. Barabasi. 2003. Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 61:567.
Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998a. Collective dynamics of 'mall-world' networks. Nature 393 (6684):440-442.
Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998b. Small world. Nature 393:440-442.

译得不好

行者 2009-06-15 1赞

内容很好，尤其开头的卡斯特文章，对他三部曲做了综述，比较提纲挈领。可惜翻译得不太好，个别地方有出入。建议读原著。

翻译那么多硬伤

nuo 2012-09-10 1赞

这本书翻译的不好，除了语句不够顺畅之外，还有很多常识性地错译，以98页的“乔治亚州”最为典型，这里应该译成“格鲁吉亚”。
对于中国那部分论述的翻译就更加让人失望了，简直~~~
看得我很不爽！~~很不爽~！！

译得不好

行者 2009-06-15 1

内容很好，尤其开头的卡斯特文章，对他三部曲做了综述，比较提纲挈领。可惜翻译得不太好，个别地方有出入。建议读原著。

翻译那么多硬伤

nuo 2012-09-10 1

这本书翻译的不好，除了语句不够顺畅之外，还有很多常识性地错译，以98页的“乔治亚州”最为典型，这里应该译成“格鲁吉亚”。
对于中国那部分论述的翻译就更加让人失望了，简直~~~
看得我很不爽！~~很不爽~！！

书非常不错，对有社会学有兴趣的人建议看看

luwg001 2011-11-15 0

书写的早了点，2003年，但质量是不错的。
其中关于中国的网络的描述，可谓真有见地，邱林川先生也许早已料到‘长城放火墙’这一网络新创举。
书中谈到的硅谷和芬兰，谈到nokia，谈到小企业和大公司，这也许能为我们的技术创新提供启发。

network society

黠之大者 2010-12-17 0

Network society is defined by Manuel Castells (Castells and Ebooks 2004) as “a society whose social structure is made of networks powered by the microelectronics-based information and communication technologies.” (Manuel Castells’s imagination knows no boundary, and it’s still inconceivable to combine the computer and the genetic engineering. This is much more like the science fiction style, because he can’t give convincing arguments and the readers can’t falsify his assertion for the limit of time.) In Manuel Castells’ idea, the network society is relevant to informationalism. Informationalism is a technological paradigm based on the augmentation of the human capacity of information processing and communication made possible by the revolutions in microelectronics, software, and genetic engineering. So what’s more important is the development of technology.
As a good construct, network society should be different from the other pre-existing constructs or concepts. There are some similar constructs, and one of them is “social network”. The differences are apparent, and the social network is much more general concept of the network relationships, network society is a phase of the development of society. So the network society can be analyzed by adopting social network analysis method (SNA). According to Manuel Castells, motivated by the microelectronics-based information and communication technologies, there are three characteristics of the network society: flexibility, scalability, and survivability.
The characteristic of flexibility is related to the network structure of the social network of network society, and he asserts that the structure of the network society is dynamic. While, this is not convincing enough, his judgment is just verbal. Manuel Castells does not analyze the structure of the structure of network society in detail. However, we can understand this characteristic by adopting social network analysis framework: Every social network has its cluster coefficient, it measure the degree of density of the social network, when the cluster coefficient is big enough, the social network is called small world network (Watts and Strogatz 1998b), which is usually known as “six degrees of separation” (Watts and Strogatz 1998a).
Another characteristic of the network society “scalability” is relevant to another pattern of the social network—“scale-free”. The scale logarithmically with the system size (Barabasi and Albert 1999). The scale-free property of the complex social network portraits the characteristics of the degree of irregularity, there are some nodes having a lot of links, but most of the nodes having only a few links. If the attacker chooses to attack one of the nodes randomly, the network can survive, but if the attacker attacks the central nodes of the network, the social network will also collapse, this is exactly the situation of the network worm and hacker on the Internet. This is also a supplement to the third character of the network society: survivability.
The rise of network society reconstructs the former social relationships of the industrial society. There are three influencing factors account for the rise of network society in the 1970: the development of industrialism, production, capitalism and statism; the cultural social movements of the late 1960s and the early 1970s; the revolution and communication technologies. The network society is relevant to the globalization, now the social network in the world can be viewed as global network society. And the advent of the global network society is constructed by many communication forms, new media and communication forms emerging from the Internet: IM, SNS, online video site, blog.
What’s more important is that the network society will change the social relationship accordingly. A global social capital transformation is carrying out now, the former forms of social capital are changed and new forms of social capital are being created by the new communication forms in network society. Especially the online social capital is becoming one of the important parts of individual’s social relationship and resources. The relationships above can be summarized as figure 1.

Figure 1 technology, media use, network society and social change

Quotation
“There is a theoretical convergence between the two technological fields (Barabasi and Albert 1999; Jeong, Neda, and Barabasi 2003) around the analytical paradigm based on networking, complexity, self organization, and emergent properties, as illustrated some time ago by the work of visionary teams of researchers at the Santa Fe Institute and as theorized by Fritjof Capra.” (Castells and Ebooks 2004)
The reason I want to highlight the words above is that, as an emergence, network society is composed of complex network distinguished by its small-world property and scale-free property, the reason for its emergence is relevant to the self organization process, we all know Barabasi’s famous paper on how complex network emerges from the isolated nodes by adopting the local rule of preferential attachment. (Barabasi and Albert 1999; Jeong, Neda, and Barabasi 2003), in addition to that, Santa Fe Institute is one of the important centers of science of complexity, it’s a pleasant to find that Castells knows something about that.

Barabasi, A. L., and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439):509.
Castells, M., and Corporation Ebooks. 2004. The network society: A cross-cultural perspective: Edward Elgar.
Jeong, H., Z. Neda, and A. L. Barabasi. 2003. Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 61:567.
Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998a. Collective dynamics of 'mall-world' networks. Nature 393 (6684):440-442.
Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998b. Small world. Nature 393:440-442.

网络社会

推荐文章

猜你喜欢

附近的人在看

推荐阅读

拓展阅读